•  
    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
    Results 11 to 17 of 17

    Thread: 2006 Aveo dissappointing MPG

    1. #11
      Wants moh powah
      Join Date
      Aug 2010
      Location
      Northern NH
      Posts
      309
      Garage empty: add car
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
      I don't find the highway numbers to unreasonable for a sedan without AC in a warm area without many hills. The city numbers are high, but "city" means something different to everyone.

      I don't care what the EPA allows Chevrolet to put on the window sticker, a sedan will always get better highway fuel economy than a hatchback with the same powertrain.

      Quote Originally Posted by thehunterooo View Post
      What the heck, I did not know you needed a "machine" to change the plugs

      This post made me lol...

      "Replying to: randydriver (Apr 16, 2006 6:26 am)
      I drive a 2009 Chevy Aveo LS, 4 door, sedan, 4 cylinder 1.6 liter Ecotec engine. It has a manual transmission, 5 speed.

      I get 42-46 driving 65-70 mph on interstate or highway all the time since buying it, checked it numerous times on long trips. I have never got below 33 mpg on a tank of gas. Driving in city usually ranges 33-35 mpg, city and highway usaully average 38-40 mpg on tank of gas. That would be like 60-70% highway and 30-40% city driving. Live in St Louis, MO area".

      I would gamble a large sum of money that this person is trolling.

      And be careful about talking about shift points/transmissions, things tend to get a little crazy (or what type of oil you should use as well).



      Sorry GM, the Turbo Sonic was priced too close to the Focus ST. I gots me a Ford.


    2. #12
      Timing belt broke, do I keep it? thehunterooo's Avatar
      Join Date
      Mar 2009
      Location
      Tampa and Orlando
      Posts
      4,359
      Garage empty: add car
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
      I just do not see 42-46 ever happening, unless the car was being towed.....

    3. #13
      I'll keep it and add a turbo
      Join Date
      Jan 2011
      Location
      Iowa
      Posts
      111
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by wylee View Post
      a sedan will always get better highway fuel economy than a hatchback with the same powertrain.
      How so? I'd like to see some hard numbers on this.

    4. #14
      Wants moh powah
      Join Date
      Aug 2010
      Location
      Northern NH
      Posts
      309
      Garage empty: add car
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by thehunterooo View Post
      I just do not see 42-46 ever happening, unless the car was being towed.....
      I've done it with my hatch. Not a fluke, a 3 tank average over 42mpg. It is painful for me to to drive that slow. A sedan could do a little better because of the body shape.
      Sorry GM, the Turbo Sonic was priced too close to the Focus ST. I gots me a Ford.


    5. #15
      Wants moh powah
      Join Date
      Aug 2010
      Location
      Northern NH
      Posts
      309
      Garage empty: add car
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by YnotVW View Post
      How so? I'd like to see some hard numbers on this.
      The drag coefficent is lower on a sedan body shape so if all other things are equal, the sedan will do better.
      Sorry GM, the Turbo Sonic was priced too close to the Focus ST. I gots me a Ford.


    6. #16
      I'll keep it and add a turbo
      Join Date
      Jan 2011
      Location
      Iowa
      Posts
      111
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
      Quote Originally Posted by YnotVW View Post
      I'd like to see some hard numbers on this.
      Did you miss the second part of this? I'm pretty good with physics and still cannot come up with how this is true. Just looking for a study that proves that a sedan is more efficient.

    7. #17
      Wants moh powah
      Join Date
      Aug 2010
      Location
      Northern NH
      Posts
      309
      Garage empty: add car
      Thanks
      0
      Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
      I've got no study handy nor have I found one that specifically addresses this. What I do know is that, based on Craig Vetter's research, having an abrupt end to a vehicles back end (as is the case for the typical hatchback shape) significantly adds to drag as opposed to a longer more tapered rear end.

      The more I think about, my original statement was probably too broad, but I stand by the principle of it as it applies to the Aveo. A Toyota Prius is a hatchback with a very low drag coefficient but it is not shaped like what I consider a typical hatchback car; the rear slopes down nearly to the point where a trunk would be on a typical sedan.




      Sorry GM, the Turbo Sonic was priced too close to the Focus ST. I gots me a Ford.


    Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

    Similar Threads

    1. Hesitation on 2006 Aveo
      By khan4rtist in forum Troubleshooting and Maintenance
      Replies: 13
      Last Post: 01-12-2015, 11:03 AM
    2. My 2006 Aveo Sedán
      By mgoreiro in forum Photographs and Videos
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: 09-02-2013, 10:20 PM
    3. A/C Not working on 2006 Aveo LT
      By ronnyhood in forum Troubleshooting and Maintenance
      Replies: 10
      Last Post: 08-05-2011, 02:09 PM
    4. Dare2Ride Aveo 1.5 LS 2006
      By dare2ride in forum Introductions
      Replies: 42
      Last Post: 10-08-2010, 03:43 PM
    5. 2006 Custom Aveo
      By jpgreen in forum For Sale / Wanted
      Replies: 14
      Last Post: 08-10-2010, 12:50 AM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •